Working paper — not peer reviewed
The Rosetta Stone of Work: Can Different Methods Share a Language?
A candidate translation layer across methods, outcomes, evidence, and software
Different fields organize work with different words, rules, and measures. This paper asks whether a small shared language could help those methods communicate without erasing their useful differences. It proposes a candidate work model, compares it with established approaches, and sketches one possible software design. The model is open to testing and revision; it is not a standard or a proven universal solution.